FERS | CSRS & Individual Disability Benefits
  • The Firm
    • Why Our Firm?
    • Practice Areas
    • Attorney Bio
    • Client’s Rights
    • Testimonials
    • Disclaimer & Privacy Policy
  • Disability Benefits
    • Employer-Sponsored Disability Plans (ERISA)
    • Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS)
    • Private (Individual) Disability Policies
  • Claims Mgmt. Services
  • SSD Appeals
  • Insurance Companies
  • Disability Resources
    • Government Sites
    • Medical Conditions & Support Groups
    • Professional Associations
  • Free Case Evaluation

The DeHaan Law Firm Law Ledger

For Immediate Release . . .

0
Posted by Editor On July 1, 2009 In News

Court Upholds Plaintiff’s Claim For Damages Due To Deceptive Practices Against Mass. Casualty And DMS

Hauppauge, NY . . . In an unusual decision, the Court denied defendents’ Massachusetts Casualty Insurance Company (“Mass Casualty”) and Disability Management Services, Inc. (“DMS”) motion to dismiss a plaintiff’s claim for damages against them for deceptive business practices under New York’s General Business Law Section 349. This decision allowed the disability case against Mass. Casualty and DMS to move forward.

The Court often dismisses claims such as this when an insurance policy is the subject of the lawsuit finding the carrier’s actions are not aimed at the general public.  However, in this case, the Court found that proof of these allegations (deceptive business practices) would be enough to establish that the actions of Mass. Casualty and DMS were targeting consumers, or the general public.

General Business Law Section 349 allows a plaintiff to recover compensatory damages, up to $1,000 in punitive damages, and attorneys’ fees if he or she is successful in a lawsuit.

“Unfortunately, we see this kind of behavior by insurance carriers all the time,” says John W. De Haan, partner at DeHaanBusse LLP, and lead counsel on the case.  “Very often, these cases are classified as simple contract disputes between two parties – which means the claimant cannot even pursue a claim under General Business Law Section 349.  As a result, even if the disabled person does ‘win’ at trial, all she recovers is her past due benefits.  She is never made ‘whole’ in that situation because she had to live without her benefits (often her only source of income) for months or even years before the lawsuit is resolved.”

Without that income, the claimant and her family often suffer financial ruination, lose their home, and have their credit ratings detroyed.

“So,” says De Haan, “every time a judge allows a General Business Law Section 349 (relative to a disability claim) to go forward, the playing field is leveled . . . a little bit at least.”

DeHaanBusse LLP is a leading New York law firm focusing on disability law including Individual Disability Insurance Policies, Employer-Sponsored Benefit (ERISA) Plans, Federal Employee Retirement Systems (FERS/CSRS) disability claims, and Military Veteran Disability claims.

Recent Posts

  • FROM: NY.GOV Disability Benefits and Paid Family Leave Insurance
  • Guidance On Long Covid
  • The Importance Of Medical Treatment When You Are On Disability
  • How Independent Are Independent Medical Examinations?
  • For Covid ‘Long Haulers,’ Battling for Disability Benefits Adds Aggravation to Exhaustion

Archives

You can find us all over the web

About The DeHaan Law Firm

The DeHaan Law Firm is focused on long-term (permanent) disability law including Individual Disability Insurance Policies, Employer Sponsored Benefit (ERISA) Plans, and the Federal Employee Retirement System (FERS).

Latest Posts

  • FROM: NY.GOV Disability Benefits and Paid Family Leave Insurance
  • Guidance On Long Covid

Search

Mailing Address

  • The DeHaan Law Firm
    • P.O. Box 5248
    • Hauppauge, NY 11788

Office Address (By Appointment Only)

    • 746 Merrick Road
    • Baldwin, NY 11510
  • (631) 582-1200
  • jdehaan@dehaan-law.com

© 2016 DeHaan Law Firm, LLP. All rights reserved. Disclaimer and Privacy Policy Client's Rights Attorney Advertising